Chapter 1: Principal Leadership & Successful Technology Implementation
1.What does the author state as the “theme” of this book? (p. 1) Do you agree or disagree that this theme is an important concept for technology leadership? Why or why not?
The author of the book is saying that the theme of the book is not only about teaching technology but it is about how technology is taught and incorporated in the teaching process so that it also properly meets standards. I think that his theme is an important concept of technology leadership. Any one can get on a computer and use it but as a leader in technology teaching using integration and standards helps to produce life learners.
2.What must a principal believe, know or be able to do in order to lead a successful technology program in a school?
A principal should offer training to teach teachers how to apply technology in their classrooms. Principals should not only tell teachers to implement technology but they should offer and teach teachers ways to “recognize, understand and integrate technology” into their lessons so hat students can gain the most out of the classroom lesson and so that they are also properly aligned with standards county, state, and countrywide. Principals must be willing to test, observe and analyzed what suggestions are working and what are not and they must be willing to change in order to have a successful technology program in their school.
3.What must a technology specialist believe, know or be able to do in order to lead a successful technology program in a school?
4.To what extent would the necessary skill set for a technology specialist differ from that of a principal?
Chapter 2: Are School and Technology Leaders Doing Enough?
1.What does it mean when people refer to a “digital divide?”
Digital divide used in terms of the book seems to mean regardless of how much equipment is in you classroom or school for that matter, does everyone, regardless of ethnic background, cultural, income statues, receive equal access to technology.
2.The digital divide, in the most basic way, can refer to student’s access to modern computers. However, the author extends his discussion of the digital divide to what other areas?
The author extends the discussion of digital divide also to the areas based on: limited ESOL students, students in rural areas, poverty conditions, minority students, female students, and low-achieving students.
3.Can you think of any other areas that the “digital divide” discussion might apply?
I could not think of other areas where digital divide discussion might apply but I am curious as to why the author specifies “female” students rather than simply saying gender of students.
4.How would you describe the difference between a “perceived” and a “documented” digital divide? (not in the text)
I think that the easiest way to describe “perceived” and a “documented” digital divide would be assumption vs. evidence
5.Review your list for questions 2 & 3. Which digital divides would best be described as “documented” and which as “perceived?”
Documented would included poverty conditions and minority students.
Perceived would include female/gender and technology,low and high achievers.
6.What are the most compelling kinds of evidence that a “digital divide” exists?
I would say that areas where evidence that digital divide exist could definitely be observes in Wealthy schools vs. Poorer schools. This is evident not only because of the amount of technology available but also... within these areas sub groups based on income, minority, majority, culture, and gender can also be used to show the existence.
7.Which “digital divide” is of greatest concern to you? What actions might help close the divide and why?
I would have to say the greatest areas of concern when it comes to the “digital divide” would have the be the low achievers vs. the high achievers because no matter how rich or poor an area may be you ultimately have to worry about the children of your classroom. As a teacher, rather than using technology to rewards the high achievers who finish their work early or to keep the students with discipline issues out of trouble, I would use it as part of centers to help engage and motivate the low achievers.
Chapter Three: Why Do Technology Programs Fail?
1.According to the author, what were the reasons that technology programs fail?
The author suggests that reasons technology programs have failed is because they do not have significant impact on teaching and learning. Some informal reasons are due to inappropriate leadership, moving to fast without sufficient an supportive staff development and failure to get the right people on board.
2.Do you agree with his claims?
I would have to say that I agree with claims. Teachers are being told to implement technology programs but are not being told how to do it. When programs are introduced and it seems like right you begin to understand the program something new is invented.
3.Are there any other causes of failure that you’d add to his list?
I think that some technology programs are being offered at the wrong levels. What is offered at a high school level may not work at an elementary level.
4.Rank your final list of “reasons for failure” from the greatest cause of failure to the least cause of failure?
1.Right people not on board
2.Lack of leadership
3.Moving to fast without sufficient and supportive staff
4.Not level appropriate
Chapter Four: Strategic Planning for Technology
1.Does your school or school system have a technology plan?
My school does not have a technology plan specifically to itself but technology is stressed to be implemented in classroom learning and lessons of all subjects.
2.What are your experiences with “Technology Planning?”
My experiences in Technology Planning would included using internet to engage my students in a subject. Using internet to engage students in learning of Phonics, ELA, Reading and Math. I have used technology and internet to allow my students to research information for Science and Social Studies. I have used projectors to teach about shadows for Science.
We are not necessarily required to plan using technology but it is something that my principal wants to see in the classroom
3.Do you think a school-level technology plan is necessary for success? Why or why not?
In the past I would have said, “No, I don't thing it is necessary however, living in a world where everything is seems to be based on technology, I think incorporating technology can assist in the learning process. I do not think that is is necessarily needed for success of school but I think in the long run technology planning will help because we are living in a technological world. As teachers, if we want our students to be successful in life then we must teach them to be life long learners. Because we are living in a technological world be need to start making technology part of our plans.
4.What do you think of Cheryl Lemke’s quote on p. 28 “There should be no technology plan, only a school improvement plan that has technology as an important component in it?”
This quote reminds me of how my school seems to operate. I can seem how technology planning could be expensive. How can you establish a technology plan in a school with little monies. So you have to make do with what you have. To keep it cost effective use what you have and implement it as best you can.
5.Can you think of any practical challenges to having an integrated school improvement/technology plan? If so, how might these challenges be overcome?
Number one would be the money. Two would be teaching teachers and individual how to properly do it. Some of these challenges could be overcome by offering course to assist teachers in how to integrate and teach technology appropriately. While easier said than done another would be to apply for technology grants to bring the equipment to your school.
6.Whether the technology plan stands alone or is imbedded into the SIP, the author points out some common pitfalls of technology planning? What are they?
The hours and time used to organize the programs and plan them will outnumber the actual hours in usage. Plans are implemented under the direction of the district level but it is unoccupied with the strategic plan of how to do it.
7.What “strategic planning” advice does the author give us in order to avoid the pitfalls?
The plans must included involvement of teachers, students and parents, staff development and instructional delivery.